Information on Result #476692
There is no (160, 256, 688)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 123163 282409 881444 299764 924401 860059 294898 311527 091855 123904 229553 446009 364568 > 2256
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (160, 257, 688)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |