Information on Result #476695

There is no (166, 256, 845)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 118940 506329 084846 053817 560766 444433 556700 279379 331274 182102 033243 868776 163420 > 2256

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 257, 845)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction