Information on Result #476696
There is no (168, 256, 911)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 121021 950824 324508 188316 873786 734293 009613 019251 600897 663320 011018 764294 451484 > 2256
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (168, 257, 911)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |