Information on Result #476775

There is no (165, 257, 799)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 231684 423930 812036 064162 006954 284327 547205 745288 264057 455346 770724 200804 080040 > 2257

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (165, 258, 799)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction