Information on Result #476856

There is no (166, 258, 813)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 485766 579204 959782 664765 546682 420392 762898 739106 640391 450351 889932 995608 888684 > 2258

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (166, 259, 813)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction