Information on Result #476878

There is no (210, 258, 16847)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 463186 075303 524840 841621 513700 418781 207159 777516 800282 248489 120011 103406 476548 > 2258

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (210, 259, 16847)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction