Information on Result #476908

There is no (107, 259, 212)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 1 046243 473453 306546 925892 327821 961838 384167 491448 528909 221705 521963 335402 052284 > 2259

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (107, 260, 212)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction