Information on Result #476935

There is no (161, 259, 676)-net in base 2, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 2m ≥ 948541 582548 182339 431781 429562 699775 101381 161598 518237 980266 872114 383591 532904 > 2259

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (161, 260, 676)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction