Information on Result #477272

There is no (29, 35, 334785)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 50031 835909 787931 > 335

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 36, 334785)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction