Information on Result #477277
There is no (16, 36, 109)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 150108 116685 683841 > 336
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 37, 109)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |