Information on Result #477560

There is no (29, 55, 284)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 178 364890 777927 318083 489305 > 355

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (29, 56, 284)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction