Information on Result #477732

There is no (30, 64, 209)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 580520 218377 866600 450588 736867 > 364

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (30, 65, 209)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction