Information on Result #477732
There is no (30, 64, 209)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 580520 218377 866600 450588 736867 > 364
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (30, 65, 209)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |