Information on Result #477734

There is no (34, 64, 335)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 516058 054742 880350 073928 473891 > 364

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 65, 335)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction