Information on Result #477775

There is no (34, 66, 301)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 31 262671 868446 494848 895913 350081 > 366

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 67, 301)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction