Information on Result #478051

There is no (34, 78, 202)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 16 620214 075480 023975 478854 410527 885581 > 378

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (34, 79, 202)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction