Information on Result #478263

There is no (36, 86, 200)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 115902 767501 606502 510455 886035 966850 787857 > 386

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (36, 87, 200)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction