Information on Result #478307

There is no (69, 87, 84889)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 323266 742129 180802 732171 643969 916551 955091 > 387

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 88, 84889)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction