Information on Result #478376

There is no (38, 90, 213)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 9 649425 353311 835892 287248 793982 864922 386513 > 390

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (38, 91, 213)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction