Information on Result #478419

There is no (69, 91, 21721)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 26 191508 521254 139571 524892 224058 965716 220443 > 391

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 92, 21721)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction