Information on Result #478535

There is no (65, 95, 3363)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 2127 308632 252001 133709 584952 105416 504211 103091 > 395

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (65, 96, 3363)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction