Information on Result #478677

There is no (44, 100, 260)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 552231 789811 639677 838668 010400 257593 946775 933313 > 3100

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 101, 260)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction