Information on Result #478678

There is no (46, 100, 294)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 519984 941614 977487 375807 672486 725937 962763 566065 > 3100

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 101, 294)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction