Information on Result #478770

There is no (41, 103, 210)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 13 997065 729355 893670 319208 449454 239410 179585 922745 > 3103

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (41, 104, 210)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction