Information on Result #478803

There is no (42, 104, 219)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 44 318162 001021 395177 532517 800964 081808 169373 068339 > 3104

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (42, 105, 219)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction