Information on Result #478808

There is no (52, 104, 403)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 43 217371 326112 013069 055174 397512 163141 609998 800085 > 3104

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 105, 403)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction