Information on Result #478837

There is no (45, 105, 254)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 134 181266 574219 000510 164510 259029 775705 474172 550229 > 3105

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (45, 106, 254)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction