Information on Result #478974

There is no (49, 109, 298)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 10502 164659 667180 143977 396443 902496 769867 740465 465245 > 3109

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 110, 298)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction