Information on Result #478984

There is no (69, 109, 1635)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 10169 720350 007131 810994 850031 934994 279182 339752 694457 > 3109

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (69, 110, 1635)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction