Information on Result #479046

There is no (53, 111, 364)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 95040 929817 982592 158019 335655 467169 648854 875861 999033 > 3111

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 112, 364)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction