Information on Result #479077

There is no (44, 112, 221)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 286754 616896 208115 434285 597287 197669 582980 280177 994049 > 3112

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 113, 221)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction