Information on Result #479078

There is no (46, 112, 243)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 275677 268521 809416 983102 848263 568992 518763 972703 806119 > 3112

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 113, 243)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction