Information on Result #479219

There is no (44, 116, 213)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 23 614732 588038 777520 958746 415339 936255 574999 777522 410321 > 3116

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (44, 117, 213)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction