Information on Result #479220

There is no (46, 116, 233)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 23 907216 575204 870201 277171 795402 711217 401914 510699 643771 > 3116

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 117, 233)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction