Information on Result #479258
There is no (49, 117, 265)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 69 060730 275390 551795 391440 654669 876715 908199 129194 636121 > 3117
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (49, 118, 265)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |