Information on Result #479258

There is no (49, 117, 265)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 69 060730 275390 551795 391440 654669 876715 908199 129194 636121 > 3117

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 118, 265)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction