Information on Result #479293

There is no (46, 118, 228)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 200 942838 279407 756954 793509 800257 385461 404561 500252 829633 > 3118

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 119, 228)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction