Information on Result #479371

There is no (52, 120, 295)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1844 763910 242382 130356 802820 940873 644805 580374 493064 851085 > 3120

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 121, 295)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction