Information on Result #479373

There is no (56, 120, 364)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1932 230678 829746 515509 248684 228937 406089 402348 667930 642689 > 3120

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 121, 364)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction