Information on Result #479447

There is no (52, 122, 288)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 17834 775248 373580 249081 894227 421232 705730 559270 749899 995265 > 3122

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (52, 123, 288)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction