Information on Result #479484

There is no (51, 123, 271)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 49547 924142 456395 074999 015389 102211 123271 509616 735327 728569 > 3123

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (51, 124, 271)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction