Information on Result #479563

There is no (53, 125, 290)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 441150 593215 624873 333299 059090 175058 887013 162435 549288 732265 > 3125

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (53, 126, 290)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction