Information on Result #479624

There is no (96, 126, 32687)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 1 310584 106396 143447 019589 452872 729115 873433 042645 735382 517411 > 3126

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 127, 32687)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction