Information on Result #479640
There is no (51, 127, 260)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 4 071445 457286 633798 286015 536716 725287 273170 870580 882204 202713 > 3127
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 128, 260)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |