Information on Result #479659

There is no (89, 127, 6111)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 3 940214 135126 034356 062243 127497 803836 334440 715003 833462 647131 > 3127

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (89, 128, 6111)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction