Information on Result #479679
There is no (52, 128, 269)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 12 807236 850698 586465 166450 480573 619410 392572 604064 494303 839505 > 3128
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (52, 129, 269)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction |