Information on Result #479680

There is no (54, 128, 293)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 12 073769 247890 715449 817558 235447 077690 491620 869917 301692 594395 > 3128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (54, 129, 293)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction