Information on Result #479686

There is no (66, 128, 550)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 12 013300 758111 374452 083339 828867 873105 957094 318679 055924 836265 > 3128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (66, 129, 550)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction