Information on Result #479701

There is no (96, 128, 22294)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 11 794955 981214 144916 285077 540063 156236 763887 728083 070561 014945 > 3128

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (96, 129, 22294)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction