Information on Result #479716

There is no (47, 129, 218)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 36 155412 305309 330943 769021 491808 201666 589123 936684 825105 902245 > 3129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (47, 130, 218)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction