Information on Result #479717

There is no (49, 129, 236)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 39 309565 925052 734773 363772 708123 709106 894186 687003 156789 519041 > 3129

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (49, 130, 236)-net in base 3 [i]m-Reduction