Information on Result #479718
There is no (51, 129, 255)-net in base 3, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 3m ≥ 35 696252 312569 816660 450251 490050 171492 815865 390261 195658 671027 > 3129
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (51, 130, 255)-net in base 3 | [i] | m-Reduction | |